<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Core Performance Fundamentals Of Oracle Data Warehousing &#8211; Introduction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://structureddata.org/2009/12/14/the-core-performance-fundamentals-of-oracle-data-warehousing-introduction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://structureddata.org/2009/12/14/the-core-performance-fundamentals-of-oracle-data-warehousing-introduction/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-core-performance-fundamentals-of-oracle-data-warehousing-introduction</link>
	<description>Data, Databases, Performance &#38; Scalability</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:05:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Core Performance Fundamentals Of Oracle Data Warehousing &#8211; Table Compression &#124; Structured Data</title>
		<link>http://structureddata.org/2009/12/14/the-core-performance-fundamentals-of-oracle-data-warehousing-introduction/#comment-15957</link>
		<dc:creator>The Core Performance Fundamentals Of Oracle Data Warehousing &#8211; Table Compression &#124; Structured Data</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 18:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://structureddata.org/?p=668#comment-15957</guid>
		<description>[...] Of Oracle Data Warehousing &#8211; Table CompressionJanuary 19, 2010 By Greg Rahn[back to Introduction] Editor&#8217;s note: This blog post does not cover Exadata Hybrid Columnar Compression.The first [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Of Oracle Data Warehousing &#8211; Table CompressionJanuary 19, 2010 By Greg Rahn[back to Introduction] Editor&#8217;s note: This blog post does not cover Exadata Hybrid Columnar Compression.The first [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Core Performance Fundamentals Of Oracle Data Warehousing &#8211; Balanced Hardware Configuration</title>
		<link>http://structureddata.org/2009/12/14/the-core-performance-fundamentals-of-oracle-data-warehousing-introduction/#comment-12033</link>
		<dc:creator>The Core Performance Fundamentals Of Oracle Data Warehousing &#8211; Balanced Hardware Configuration</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://structureddata.org/?p=668#comment-12033</guid>
		<description>[...] Of Oracle Data Warehousing &#8211; Balanced Hardware Configuration December 22nd, 2009[back to Introduction]If you want to build a house that will stand the test of time, you need to build on a solid [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Of Oracle Data Warehousing &#8211; Balanced Hardware Configuration December 22nd, 2009[back to Introduction]If you want to build a house that will stand the test of time, you need to build on a solid [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Core Performance Fundamentals Of Oracle Data Warehousing – Set Processing vs Row Processing</title>
		<link>http://structureddata.org/2009/12/14/the-core-performance-fundamentals-of-oracle-data-warehousing-introduction/#comment-11813</link>
		<dc:creator>The Core Performance Fundamentals Of Oracle Data Warehousing – Set Processing vs Row Processing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 21:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://structureddata.org/?p=668#comment-11813</guid>
		<description>[...] – Set Processing vs Row Processing July 20th, 2010 Goto comments Leave a comment[back to Introduction]In over six years of doing data warehouse POCs and benchmarks for clients there is one area that I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] – Set Processing vs Row Processing July 20th, 2010 Goto comments Leave a comment[back to Introduction]In over six years of doing data warehouse POCs and benchmarks for clients there is one area that I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Core Performance Fundamentals Of Oracle Data Warehousing – Set Processing vs Row Processing</title>
		<link>http://structureddata.org/2009/12/14/the-core-performance-fundamentals-of-oracle-data-warehousing-introduction/#comment-11814</link>
		<dc:creator>The Core Performance Fundamentals Of Oracle Data Warehousing – Set Processing vs Row Processing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 21:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://structureddata.org/?p=668#comment-11814</guid>
		<description>[...] – Set Processing vs Row Processing July 20th, 2010 Goto comments Leave a comment[back to Introduction]In over six years of doing data warehouse POCs and benchmarks for clients there is one area that I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] – Set Processing vs Row Processing July 20th, 2010 Goto comments Leave a comment[back to Introduction]In over six years of doing data warehouse POCs and benchmarks for clients there is one area that I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DW Introduction &#171; Oracle Scratchpad</title>
		<link>http://structureddata.org/2009/12/14/the-core-performance-fundamentals-of-oracle-data-warehousing-introduction/#comment-11150</link>
		<dc:creator>DW Introduction &#171; Oracle Scratchpad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://structureddata.org/?p=668#comment-11150</guid>
		<description>[...] series on &#8220;Core Performance Fundamentals of Oracle Data Warehousing&#8221;. Here&#8217;s his catalogue of the first four or five articles in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] series on &#8220;Core Performance Fundamentals of Oracle Data Warehousing&#8221;. Here&#8217;s his catalogue of the first four or five articles in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Core Performance Fundamentals Of Oracle Data Warehousing &#8211; Data Loading</title>
		<link>http://structureddata.org/2009/12/14/the-core-performance-fundamentals-of-oracle-data-warehousing-introduction/#comment-11119</link>
		<dc:creator>The Core Performance Fundamentals Of Oracle Data Warehousing &#8211; Data Loading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://structureddata.org/?p=668#comment-11119</guid>
		<description>[...] Oracle Data Warehousing &#8211; Data Loading April 23rd, 2010 Goto comments Leave a comment[back to Introduction]Getting flat file data into your Oracle data warehouse is likely a daily (or more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Oracle Data Warehousing &#8211; Data Loading April 23rd, 2010 Goto comments Leave a comment[back to Introduction]Getting flat file data into your Oracle data warehouse is likely a daily (or more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Rahn</title>
		<link>http://structureddata.org/2009/12/14/the-core-performance-fundamentals-of-oracle-data-warehousing-introduction/#comment-11077</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Rahn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://structureddata.org/?p=668#comment-11077</guid>
		<description>@Eric Sun

This comment doesn&#039;t have much of anything to do with the post and this is not a support forum but I will give you some advice this one time.  Parallel Execution (PX) will use as few nodes as possible to satisfy the execution because it is more efficient to do so (why run something on 4 computers when there are enough resources to run it on 1?).  Given you have only 8 slaves (maybe that is DOP=8 and there are 8 producer slaves and 8 consumer slaves, or you have DOP=4 and 4 produces/4 consumers) and 4 nodes, it seems likely that in either case 1 single node can satisfy the PX requirements.  If you want to use all 4 nodes, use a DOP of the number of CPUs in the cluster (or 2x the CPUs [cpu_count] in the cluster, which is the &quot;default&quot; DOP).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Eric Sun</p>
<p>This comment doesn&#8217;t have much of anything to do with the post and this is not a support forum but I will give you some advice this one time.  Parallel Execution (PX) will use as few nodes as possible to satisfy the execution because it is more efficient to do so (why run something on 4 computers when there are enough resources to run it on 1?).  Given you have only 8 slaves (maybe that is DOP=8 and there are 8 producer slaves and 8 consumer slaves, or you have DOP=4 and 4 produces/4 consumers) and 4 nodes, it seems likely that in either case 1 single node can satisfy the PX requirements.  If you want to use all 4 nodes, use a DOP of the number of CPUs in the cluster (or 2x the CPUs [cpu_count] in the cluster, which is the &#8220;default&#8221; DOP).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Sun</title>
		<link>http://structureddata.org/2009/12/14/the-core-performance-fundamentals-of-oracle-data-warehousing-introduction/#comment-11075</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Sun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 06:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://structureddata.org/?p=668#comment-11075</guid>
		<description>Hi Greg,

Do you which parameters in Oracle 11g and 10g determine how the coordinator/slave queries are distributed among nodes? I&#039;ve observed a strange thing in my 4-node RAC. The coordinator is on node-A, but all the 8 slaves are all on node-B. The slaves are never on the same node as coordinator. Even for full partition-wise joins among hash-partitioned tables, the slaves are never distributed across multiple nodes. 

Load balance is enabled in the TNS entry. Is there any fundamental setting that I missed?

Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Greg,</p>
<p>Do you which parameters in Oracle 11g and 10g determine how the coordinator/slave queries are distributed among nodes? I&#8217;ve observed a strange thing in my 4-node RAC. The coordinator is on node-A, but all the 8 slaves are all on node-B. The slaves are never on the same node as coordinator. Even for full partition-wise joins among hash-partitioned tables, the slaves are never distributed across multiple nodes. </p>
<p>Load balance is enabled in the TNS entry. Is there any fundamental setting that I missed?</p>
<p>Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Rahn</title>
		<link>http://structureddata.org/2009/12/14/the-core-performance-fundamentals-of-oracle-data-warehousing-introduction/#comment-11065</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Rahn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 01:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://structureddata.org/?p=668#comment-11065</guid>
		<description>@Marco Gralike 
I spend 99% of my time in the Data Warehouse area so the topics are more DW focused, but glad that Doug guy invited you.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Marco Gralike<br />
I spend 99% of my time in the Data Warehouse area so the topics are more DW focused, but glad that Doug guy invited you.  ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marco Gralike</title>
		<link>http://structureddata.org/2009/12/14/the-core-performance-fundamentals-of-oracle-data-warehousing-introduction/#comment-10930</link>
		<dc:creator>Marco Gralike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 17:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://structureddata.org/?p=668#comment-10930</guid>
		<description>Hi Greg, 

indeed, I enjoyed the &quot;chalk and talk&quot; session very much, one of my highlights during OOW and grateful that that Scottish guy tagged me along (toys included...). I really think your insights are applicable on more than Data Warehousing so one happy guy will follow the series and see how I can make use of them in my &quot;domain&quot;...

;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Greg, </p>
<p>indeed, I enjoyed the &#8220;chalk and talk&#8221; session very much, one of my highlights during OOW and grateful that that Scottish guy tagged me along (toys included&#8230;). I really think your insights are applicable on more than Data Warehousing so one happy guy will follow the series and see how I can make use of them in my &#8220;domain&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/3 queries in 0.001 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 406/407 objects using disk: basic

Served from: structureddata.org @ 2012-02-09 18:35:18 -->
