<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oracle And HP Take Back #1 Spot For 1TB TPC-H Benchmark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://structureddata.org/2009/06/03/oracle-and-hp-take-back-1-spot-for-1tb-tpc-h-benchmark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://structureddata.org/2009/06/03/oracle-and-hp-take-back-1-spot-for-1tb-tpc-h-benchmark/</link>
	<description>Oracle Database Performance And Scalability Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 22:11:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: World-Record TPC-H Result Proves Oracle Exadata Storage Server is 10x Faster Than Conventional Storage on a Per-Disk Basis! &#171; Kevin Closson&#8217;s Oracle Blog: Platform, Storage &#38; Clustering Topics Related to Oracle Databases</title>
		<link>http://structureddata.org/2009/06/03/oracle-and-hp-take-back-1-spot-for-1tb-tpc-h-benchmark/comment-page-1/#comment-549</link>
		<dc:creator>World-Record TPC-H Result Proves Oracle Exadata Storage Server is 10x Faster Than Conventional Storage on a Per-Disk Basis! &#171; Kevin Closson&#8217;s Oracle Blog: Platform, Storage &#38; Clustering Topics Related to Oracle Databases</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 22:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://structureddata.org/?p=556#comment-549</guid>
		<description>[...] Greg Rahn&#8217;s post on the topic. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Greg Rahn&#8217;s post on the topic. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
