<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ideas For Oracle Performance Topics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://structureddata.org/2007/10/26/ideas-for-oracle-performance-topics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://structureddata.org/2007/10/26/ideas-for-oracle-performance-topics/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ideas-for-oracle-performance-topics</link>
	<description>Data, Databases, Performance &#38; Scalability</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 01:52:50 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: whiz</title>
		<link>http://structureddata.org/2007/10/26/ideas-for-oracle-performance-topics/#comment-11096</link>
		<dc:creator>whiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 22:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://structureddata.org/2007/10/26/ideas-for-oracle-performance-topics/#comment-11096</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-49&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Krishna&lt;/a&gt; 
Please Krishna,

That was an absolute statement. Perhaps &quot;The DBA&#039;s I come across lack .....&quot;
By saying in the manner you have, its unfair.

Consider this ....do you know that speeds of HDD matter a lot in latency and I/O.
If you do then good. However in the end what really matters is the absolute result.
Please allow me to give you an example.

Consider a 15K rpm HDD.
Now its obvious a 20K rpm would be faster. But then is it ?
Please do the maths and you shall agree to the below.
In order to shave off latency of just 1ms off a 15K rpm drive, the drive has to run at speed of 30K rpm. That&#039;s twice for a measly 1ms.
And the technology is not advanced enough for that drive speed.

Absolute results matter. if 15K gives me what I want then 20K is really not up to it.
The time taken for a job or query is the best unit of judgement.

Basically I am trying so say :
A Performance Tuning DBA is knowledgeable of all aspects of the domain.
I would not generalise an absolute comment.

Thanks,
W.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-49" rel="nofollow">@Krishna</a><br />
Please Krishna,</p>
<p>That was an absolute statement. Perhaps &#8220;The DBA&#8217;s I come across lack &#8230;..&#8221;<br />
By saying in the manner you have, its unfair.</p>
<p>Consider this &#8230;.do you know that speeds of HDD matter a lot in latency and I/O.<br />
If you do then good. However in the end what really matters is the absolute result.<br />
Please allow me to give you an example.</p>
<p>Consider a 15K rpm HDD.<br />
Now its obvious a 20K rpm would be faster. But then is it ?<br />
Please do the maths and you shall agree to the below.<br />
In order to shave off latency of just 1ms off a 15K rpm drive, the drive has to run at speed of 30K rpm. That&#8217;s twice for a measly 1ms.<br />
And the technology is not advanced enough for that drive speed.</p>
<p>Absolute results matter. if 15K gives me what I want then 20K is really not up to it.<br />
The time taken for a job or query is the best unit of judgement.</p>
<p>Basically I am trying so say :<br />
A Performance Tuning DBA is knowledgeable of all aspects of the domain.<br />
I would not generalise an absolute comment.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
W.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smallkoala</title>
		<link>http://structureddata.org/2007/10/26/ideas-for-oracle-performance-topics/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>smallkoala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 04:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://structureddata.org/2007/10/26/ideas-for-oracle-performance-topics/#comment-50</guid>
		<description>We know awr report is important for us to identify performance issues.But the report has a lot of context and not easy to understand.Could you post some typical tips about reading awr report? Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We know awr report is important for us to identify performance issues.But the report has a lot of context and not easy to understand.Could you post some typical tips about reading awr report? Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krishna</title>
		<link>http://structureddata.org/2007/10/26/ideas-for-oracle-performance-topics/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Krishna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 04:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://structureddata.org/2007/10/26/ideas-for-oracle-performance-topics/#comment-49</guid>
		<description>Hi Greg,

I have often noticed that dba&#039;s are not very knowledgeable when it comes to viewing system/storage stats to identify performance bottlenecks with respect to their database.

In that context, can you post on a few simple and quick checks to identify if one is facing a performance issue ? This would be something which an Oracle DBA with non-privileged access can execute and draw conclusions - either through the database or system commands (Unix/Linux).

Thanks
Krishna</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Greg,</p>
<p>I have often noticed that dba&#8217;s are not very knowledgeable when it comes to viewing system/storage stats to identify performance bottlenecks with respect to their database.</p>
<p>In that context, can you post on a few simple and quick checks to identify if one is facing a performance issue ? This would be something which an Oracle DBA with non-privileged access can execute and draw conclusions &#8211; either through the database or system commands (Unix/Linux).</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Krishna</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 8/11 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 338/367 objects using disk: basic

Served from: structureddata.org @ 2012-05-17 07:16:08 -->
