<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Ideas For Oracle Performance Topics</title> <atom:link href="http://structureddata.org/2007/10/26/ideas-for-oracle-performance-topics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://structureddata.org/2007/10/26/ideas-for-oracle-performance-topics/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=ideas-for-oracle-performance-topics</link> <description>Oracle Database Performance and Scalability Blog</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 20:58:50 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator> <item><title>By: whiz</title><link>http://structureddata.org/2007/10/26/ideas-for-oracle-performance-topics/comment-page-1/#comment-11096</link> <dc:creator>whiz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 22:11:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://structureddata.org/2007/10/26/ideas-for-oracle-performance-topics/#comment-11096</guid> <description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-49&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Krishna&lt;/a&gt;
Please Krishna,That was an absolute statement. Perhaps &quot;The DBA&#039;s I come across lack .....&quot;
By saying in the manner you have, its unfair.Consider this ....do you know that speeds of HDD matter a lot in latency and I/O.
If you do then good. However in the end what really matters is the absolute result.
Please allow me to give you an example.Consider a 15K rpm HDD.
Now its obvious a 20K rpm would be faster. But then is it ?
Please do the maths and you shall agree to the below.
In order to shave off latency of just 1ms off a 15K rpm drive, the drive has to run at speed of 30K rpm. That&#039;s twice for a measly 1ms.
And the technology is not advanced enough for that drive speed.Absolute results matter. if 15K gives me what I want then 20K is really not up to it.
The time taken for a job or query is the best unit of judgement.Basically I am trying so say :
A Performance Tuning DBA is knowledgeable of all aspects of the domain.
I would not generalise an absolute comment.Thanks,
W.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href="#comment-49" rel="nofollow">@Krishna</a><br
/> Please Krishna,</p><p>That was an absolute statement. Perhaps &#8220;The DBA&#8217;s I come across lack &#8230;..&#8221;<br
/> By saying in the manner you have, its unfair.</p><p>Consider this &#8230;.do you know that speeds of HDD matter a lot in latency and I/O.<br
/> If you do then good. However in the end what really matters is the absolute result.<br
/> Please allow me to give you an example.</p><p>Consider a 15K rpm HDD.<br
/> Now its obvious a 20K rpm would be faster. But then is it ?<br
/> Please do the maths and you shall agree to the below.<br
/> In order to shave off latency of just 1ms off a 15K rpm drive, the drive has to run at speed of 30K rpm. That&#8217;s twice for a measly 1ms.<br
/> And the technology is not advanced enough for that drive speed.</p><p>Absolute results matter. if 15K gives me what I want then 20K is really not up to it.<br
/> The time taken for a job or query is the best unit of judgement.</p><p>Basically I am trying so say :<br
/> A Performance Tuning DBA is knowledgeable of all aspects of the domain.<br
/> I would not generalise an absolute comment.</p><p>Thanks,<br
/> W.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: smallkoala</title><link>http://structureddata.org/2007/10/26/ideas-for-oracle-performance-topics/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link> <dc:creator>smallkoala</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 04:55:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://structureddata.org/2007/10/26/ideas-for-oracle-performance-topics/#comment-50</guid> <description>We know awr report is important for us to identify performance issues.But the report has a lot of context and not easy to understand.Could you post some typical tips about reading awr report? Thanks.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We know awr report is important for us to identify performance issues.But the report has a lot of context and not easy to understand.Could you post some typical tips about reading awr report? Thanks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Krishna</title><link>http://structureddata.org/2007/10/26/ideas-for-oracle-performance-topics/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link> <dc:creator>Krishna</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 04:04:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://structureddata.org/2007/10/26/ideas-for-oracle-performance-topics/#comment-49</guid> <description>Hi Greg,I have often noticed that dba&#039;s are not very knowledgeable when it comes to viewing system/storage stats to identify performance bottlenecks with respect to their database.In that context, can you post on a few simple and quick checks to identify if one is facing a performance issue ? This would be something which an Oracle DBA with non-privileged access can execute and draw conclusions - either through the database or system commands (Unix/Linux).Thanks
Krishna</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Greg,</p><p>I have often noticed that dba&#8217;s are not very knowledgeable when it comes to viewing system/storage stats to identify performance bottlenecks with respect to their database.</p><p>In that context, can you post on a few simple and quick checks to identify if one is facing a performance issue ? This would be something which an Oracle DBA with non-privileged access can execute and draw conclusions &#8211; either through the database or system commands (Unix/Linux).</p><p>Thanks<br
/> Krishna</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/10 queries in 0.502 seconds using disk

Served from: structureddata.org @ 2010-09-09 10:33:30 -->